<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mass transit stumbles again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andstillipersist.com/2008/05/mass-transit-stumbles-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andstillipersist.com/2008/05/mass-transit-stumbles-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 18:07:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwcushman</title>
		<link>http://andstillipersist.com/2008/05/mass-transit-stumbles-again/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>cwcushman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://and-still-i-persist.com/?p=901#comment-334</guid>
		<description>My question is why do we always assume that mass transit has to be self-sufficient?  I read somewhere once that not even India&#039;s rail system, the most heavily used system in the world, can operate without government subsidies.

When mass transit is seen as a government service, comparable to water, education, police / fire, roads, etc. and not as a &quot;company&quot; then it will start to operate as intended.  Right now we have systems trying to break even with the end result being sporadic service and a large contingent of people opting for other means of transportation.

A great example is the Coaster in San Diego County.  It does not operate on Sundays or weekend evenings which means I drive downtown when I would much rather take the public transportation.  And there is a market; they run special trains for the baseball games that are heavily used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is why do we always assume that mass transit has to be self-sufficient?  I read somewhere once that not even India&#8217;s rail system, the most heavily used system in the world, can operate without government subsidies.</p>
<p>When mass transit is seen as a government service, comparable to water, education, police / fire, roads, etc. and not as a &#8220;company&#8221; then it will start to operate as intended.  Right now we have systems trying to break even with the end result being sporadic service and a large contingent of people opting for other means of transportation.</p>
<p>A great example is the Coaster in San Diego County.  It does not operate on Sundays or weekend evenings which means I drive downtown when I would much rather take the public transportation.  And there is a market; they run special trains for the baseball games that are heavily used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

